Design was the theme found when reading the articles for the week. After reading three different articles; "First Impressions Count For Web", "Changing The Face of Web Surfing", and "Is Design Political" we learned how the ways in which a web site is designed affects a persons first and long lasting impression of the site, the accessibility of websites, and how design on the internet affects the outcome of users on the internet.
In the first article "First Impressions Count For Web" we learn that the internet is no different than a book or another person when it comes to judging. A site is judged by its viewers in less than the first second that they are there.
- What do you think of this?
- What do you think are some of the ways sites appeal or repel its users?
- Do you think that this is an accurate way to form an opinion, and if a site doesn't
appeal to a person in the first milliseconds do you you thin k that they carry a bias
while still viewing the site
In the second article "Changing The Force of Web Surfing" we went into detail about web sites that are not easily accessed and are difficult to navigate for the users. It compares these sites to buildings without ramps, does this mean that we are all disabled users? The article further explains how the users of these sites often build their own ramps, go in and create their own version of the site, create a more accessible site on their own network and server. Needless to say the owners of the real sits often do not appreciate this and the two parties wind up in court. To me, I side with the companies that are losing their customers to imposter's, whether the site is navigable or not, guests should not be led away to sites that could be fraudulent. The customers could be led to fill in their personal information for a less than worth site, they could be handing over their identity and not even know it.
- Do you think "volunteering" and redoing a site without permission should be legal?
- Do you think that the users are right in wanting a good site?
- How often do you come across a site that is difficult to navigate?
- Do you think all sites will eventually be forced to be accessible to all?
Finally we read the article "Is Design Political" this article didn't focus so much on the way internet design affected its users but it did relate. It specifically made comments of design as propaganda. The way I took this article was that when a site is trying to sell a product it is going to be designed to shine the best light on the product, have positive testimonials, really good pictures of the product, give similar products, the site does anything to make a sale. The article explains how fifty years ago prisons were designed to keep prisoners locked up, and did not have many classes or ways for the prisoners to be rehabilitated. Back then eighty percent of funding went to keeping prisoners secure and twenty percent went to rehabilitation programs. Now its just the opposite with eighty percent going towards programs like education. Same with schools, fifty years ago they were designed with the teachers giving lectures, now they promote teamwork. Fast Food is another way design is used to sell products, making life simpler, but the companies try to hide the affects like weight gain and diabetes.
- Do you feel that site design does directly correlate to the way its users respond?
- What are some ways that design affects the users?
- Do you feel that this article relates to the internet or is more of a non internet
article?
- What is another way that design has changed over time, (schooling, prison system) do you
think it was for the better?
September 27 2006, 20:49:07 UTC 5 years ago
Response for "First Impressions"
I agree with the fact that a site is similar to books in the way that they are judged. I have heard that a person will judge a site during the first fifteen seconds of their visit. When it comes to books, a reader will have their mind made up after the first paragraph. The quickness of the judgments does resemble each other. However, I do think that there are differences in the criteria for judgment between the two. For example, a site's reputation heavily depends upon the way it looks. The way in which things are arranged on the site can greatly affect how the site is perceived. Although books may literally be judged on how their cover looks, visuals do not affect the content of the literature, whereas the look of the site can completely transform how information is displayed. Some ways which sites can appeal to users is through images and white space. If a site has lots of intriguing pictures then the viewer will be drawn to it. Also alot of space makes the content clearer and easier to read, thus allowing the site to be navigated easily. The creator of the site has to be careful not to have too much white space though, or else their site will seem boring. One way which a site can repel users is if the site is too cluttered. Too many images and words can cause make the site confusing. If the viewer can't find what they are looking for quickly, then they will leave. I do not feel that judging something on first impressions is an accurate way to form an opinion. I think that pre-biases formed right away can stay with a person for the rest of their visit on a site. I know that when I visit a site which looks "bad" I won't take the time to fully navigate it even though it may have something valuable to offer.October 1 2006, 19:27:44 UTC 5 years ago
October 2 2006, 14:37:12 UTC 5 years ago
Do you think that this is an accurate way to form an opinion, and if a site doesn't appeal to a person in the first milliseconds do you you think that they carry a bias while still viewing the site?
Well, whether it's accurate or not, I think it's something that human beings do, especially since in this era we are bombarded with information and thus we have trained ourselves to make those split-second discernments in order to filter and make sense of the environment. I think that some users may just leave the site altogether, or they may spend less time on the site or not use the site for business or other transactions (if it's that kind of site). I also think that most of the biases are unconscious -- it's not something that people could explain. However, it does mean that as a Web writer or designer, you need to be aware of them...
Do you think all sites will eventually be forced to be accessible to all?
In the United States, there are two sets of guidelines that cover accessibility issues like the article discussed. One is the WC3 Guidelines, which are international guidelines written by the World Wide Web consortium. The other is the Section 508 guidelines, which are named from the section in the Americans With Disabilities Act that they come from. All government sites or sites that take government money should be in compliance with the Section 508 guidelines, and people can sue if things like government or state Web sites are not accessible. Do you think that there needs to be federal or state law to cover business Web sites?
Do you feel that this article [Politics of Design] relates to the internet or is more of a non internet article?
I chose this article because I wanted to note that Web design and Web writing are part of a larger concept set -- the idea of design in general, and more specifically the concepts of user-centered design:
Doing Web design is a situation where you-as-a-designer or you-as-a-writer can work for social justice and work to help people feel included and empowered, or a situation where people can be excluded. When thinking about Web design, it can be useful to think about it as part of the "big picture" of design in general, and to think about the social forces which shape the design choices that people make.
October 2 2006, 19:04:25 UTC 5 years ago
Can't judge a book by its cover
In the first article, "First impressions for the web" states that a user makes a decision on a website under the first second they view it. That's discouraging to advertisers... But I think in all actuality, it doesn't really give that site justice. But I do think that this statistic is pretty accurate, I found myself making assuptions about the website before I even started reading the article, simply from the design. The old saying holds true, "You can't judge a book by it's cover". Just because the initial experience (in under the first second) is not great, the user usually leaves that site and looks for a better one, but not always a better site. That's too bad because not all sites that are displeasing to the eye are set up terrible. A site should be judged on content, not design. The second article talks about the idea that some users will re-design an original website with the user's wants more in mind, making the site more user friendly and easier to navigate. However, this does not always go over so well with the creators of the original site. That will be intersting to see if more rules and regulations pop up now that this is becoming an issue. Will it become illegal to re-design someone else's site? And advertising on the web is becoming more and more competitive. With tons of surfers, it's an advertiser's market, and the design of the site is it's prominent feature.