The notion that ideas can be protected or copyrighted has gone into disarray since the everyday use of the internet. It is a war between producers, pirates, and consumers. The article “Wired, The Free and the Unfree” demonstrates how ownership of intellectual property has become a very messy business. The author promotes the idea that our society is what it is because the proprietors of these concepts had the ability to benefit from, and exploit its success.
The author asks some great open-ended questions that I would like to bring into our discussion, discussing in more detail pirating music.
-When does market protection become a monopoly?
-Who's to say when a discovery's social benefit outweighs an individual's reward?
-When is sharing stealing?
(Do the producers of the music industry have a monopoly over music consumer media?)
(Who is the authoritative voice over who benefits more: the person capitalizing on the idea or property, or the person learning or listening from the intellectual property… Who benefits more, and merits its reward?)
(Regards to the music industry; peer to peer websites are a dime a dozen and the music industry can’t keep up on keeping them down… When do you think sharing is stealing?)
In the first link Wired gives a map, labeling parts of the world in this “digital war”. Did you notice the United States was dark blue…? Our society thrives on control of intellectual property; government officials highly advocate copyrights and patents. Do you disagree or agree with this analysis?
The invention of peer to peer programs was a huge milestone in the development of the internet, Napster created a file sharing program (that many would mimic) that would infringe on copyright and patent laws throughout the entire world as shown in “Streaming Media”, although the U.S. advocates copyrights and patents, it has the highest rate of piracy through p2p programs in audio, images, video, and software.
(*Because there is so much information in this article I decided to focus on the music industry, because I think that it is what “we” as students can mostly associate ourselves with… I mean C’mon.. Who doesn’t have Morpheus or something similar on their own computer; It is possible one of you may even be pirating music right now…)
I’ve included a link to the RIAA, The Recording Industry Association of America, heading the war on piracy. http://www.riaa.com/default.asp
The author pokes fun at this concept of patents when he says the man who invented farming should’ve put a patent on it, and our culture would’ve never moved past Hunting and Gathering. The article closes with how “open sourcing” has affected our society in so many ways.
“The Digital Divide: It's Still There” poses some alarming statistics regarding the exposure of computers and the internet to different ethnic groups. 2 of every 3 white students use the internet, but less than half of blacks and hispanics use the internet. Anyone can see how this could promote huge barriers in the work race for minorities.
Also, it is noted that although there are advances for internet use during school; only 54% of white students use the internet at home, while appx 26% of black or hispanic kids do. This is more troublesome than you would initially think, because our education system is beginning to expect the use of the internet. In today's classroom you are certainly expected to have use of the internet. This is interesting because the inernet it becoming expected of students... Do you think it is in our near future for textbooks to be obsolete?
“Wallflower at the Web Party”
One major problem of Friendster was it was not very functioning. It could take up to 40 seconds to load the web site. Friendster wasn't prepared for the massive response it got, and regardless of the amount of money and talent- it became an example of disaster within the social networking sites. Friendster certainly had some huge power players in Silicon Valley, but through mostly functional error, Friendster lost its popularity. One finger is pointed at the fact that most of the men on the Friendster board were in their 50's, much older than their primary demographic... Do you think this made a huge difference, after reading this article, why do you think Friendster failed? Or do you think it failed at all? The Ceo of Friendster said that every company has a “MySpace”, or a similar competitor. After all, Friendster has 15 million users all over the world, under most umbrellas this would be considered successful.
November 8 2006, 23:50:01 UTC 5 years ago
Growth of Internet Response
Do I think that downloading music is wrong? The answer is no, but I do think that downloading music illegally does cross some moral/ethical boundaries. Now for me to say this is completely hypocritical because I have downloaded hundreds of songs/images/videos without paying for them. What changed my mind, however, was that thought of someone stealing my work for their own usage without crediting me some how. Software like Napster or Kazaa has allowed people to get things for free which should have been paid for. The artists of those songs worked hard to create their music and they deserve to be reimbursed for their dedication. I no longer download music but, of course another option would be to download music legally. I do not think that the government is hypocritical at all when it comes to this situation. It was pointed out that piracy exists even though the United States advocates copyrights, but one must keep in mind that the government has been creating new laws to prevent piracy from happening. Their response to Napster-like programs, I feel, shows their affirmation of copyrights and patents. To move on to a new subject, I definitely agree that computers are becoming a huge part of the class room. Although I feel that computers can be useful in the learning process, there are certain skills which they can not teach a child. For example, kindergarteners can not learn to write their alphabet by using a key board, they need to use a pen and paper. In fact, nowadays, children have to take a test before they can even enter kindergarten to make sure they have learned the alphabet and numbers and other elementary skills. If a child is not "up to par" then they are not allowed to start kindergarten. I actually know a little boy who failed the test because he couldn't write letters properly. His failure could be blamed on the fact that Ricky (the little boy) spent majority of his time playing on the computer or playing video games. He knew how to navigate the internet at a skilled level but his poor writing skills kept him from advancing. I feel that if the computer continues to be such a big part in kids' lives then they will miss out on important mechanical skills. There needs to be a system which combines both effective to ensure that kids will get a useful education.November 12 2006, 21:05:17 UTC 5 years ago
November 29 2006, 19:52:19 UTC 5 years ago
Internet growth
I think that copyrights and patents are extremely important and I think they have allowed our country to grow as it has. If people couldn't patent their ideas they may be extremely nervous to post their ideas because they could be stolen. But I also think it is possible for people to patent idea after idea, then never do anything with the ideas a monopoly could form where they could own thousands of ideas and no one can do anything with them even if they have amazing ideas to create and expand. The people who have patented all the ideas could then sell there ideas for as much as they wanted. I think that would be a crime because these ideas could really help people and if the ideas go unused its a sad thing. Also if someone discovers something that could help the world patents it and just lets it sit there it should be legal to take the idea and help people. It is there own fault for sitting on the idea and not moving forward. Sharing copyrighted material is always stealing, but does that mean that passing around a copy of a book i purchased is illegal? What if my friend bought a CD and then I took it and then gave it to someone else, is that stealing?I understand why people steal music, because its expensive. In my opinion it costs more than its worth, music companies should brag that it costs them less than 10 cents to create a CD and then charge 20 bucks for that same CD. I'm not condoning sharing music but I think that if the price of CDs would come down more people may be willing to purchase the CD. I think that both the creator and the user gain from intellectual property. The creator gains money and respect, the user can gain knowledge or entertainment, its when one side takes it to far that the other misses out.
I do believe that eventually text books will be out of print, already we have the option to buy "e-textbooks" from the bookstore. It is a huge disadvantage to not be able to use the internet. But if cost is the main reason people do not have the internet, the internet may be getting closer. The price of a computer is going down every day, right now you can buy a computer for $300 and the price of the internet can be just pennies a day as well. I think over time the gap will begin to close. Especially in schools because it is becoming standard for all schools to have computer labs.
With "Friendster" i do believe that the fact that almost all of the employees were over 50 had a huge part in the failure of the site. I also think that these people didn't care enough about the user and cared more about themselves and the quick money that could come from the site. But how can you expect money and advances in the site if the basics don't even work. They had some really good ideas and honestly if they had worked their way up i think it could have been the first MySpace. But because of bad decisions it fell back in the race, its still in their but I don't think it could ever be number one.
December 4 2006, 22:11:51 UTC 5 years ago
-When does market protection become a monopoly?
I think that that is a personal view. Everyone has different views on what is too much and what is not enough.
-Who's to say when a discovery's social benefit outweighs an individual's reward?
I think that, again, (not to be repetitive) that they are not in line with each other. One individual may think that the social benefit outweighs their personal reward, whereas others may like to feel good about themselves instead of worrying about how it affects their lives.
-When is sharing stealing?
Sharing is stealing when you take something that is not in agreement of taking. For example, music that is "free" online should really be paid for.
Article 2
In today's classroom you are certainly expected to have use of the internet. This is interesting because the inernet it becoming expected of students... Do you think it is in our near future for textbooks to be obsolete?
I do not think that it is something to be looked over as not a possibility. Blackboard is allowing students to take classes online solely, so I think that e-textbooks are the next thing to come. let me tell you one thing, I wont be complaining when I dont have to pay 1,000 dollars a semester for books!
Article 3
Do you think this made a huge difference, after reading this article, why do you think Friendster failed? Or do you think it failed at all?
I think that Friendster failed due to lack of knowledge of users. Their older age may have affected this or may not have; they were just poor social networking site owners. Out of the 15 million users I can guarantee that half don't actually use the site.
December 7 2006, 22:45:11 UTC 5 years ago
December 8 2006, 00:50:20 UTC 5 years ago